Home
/
Crypto news
/
Technology developments
/

Are hardware wallets trustworthy? examining trng claims

Hardware Wallets Under Fire | New Trust Issues Emerge

By

Omar Ali

Aug 5, 2026, 11:37 PM

Updated

Aug 14, 2026, 12:39 PM

2 minutes of duration

A hardware wallet is shown next to a graphic representation of True Random Number Generators, highlighting security concerns.

Concerns about the reliability of hardware wallets are rising as users question the integrity of True Random Number Generators (TRNG) employed by several manufacturers. Following the revelation of a significant bug in ColdCard’s firmware, skepticism deepens about ROI security, leaving many to reconsider their options.

ColdCard's Firmware Flaw Exposed

Users are now scrutinizing wallet manufacturers after the exposure of a major bug in Coinkite's ColdCard, impacting its TRNG functionality. This bug led to the unintentional use of predictable randomness, raising doubts about security across the sector. A user shared, "Claude Code found the bug in eight minutes. The negligence was shocking for a company focused on generating true randomness."

Trust Issues Intensify

Forum discussions reveal a growing sentiment among users about trusting manufacturers. An anonymous comment noted, "If you don't trust the manufacturer, then generate the seed for yourself," suggesting a shift toward self-custody among crypto enthusiasts. Some comments advocate for multi-signature setups. One user argued, "An easy way to deal with needing to trust a single point of failure from a hardware wallet is a basic multisig wallet. Two different vendors are advisable."

Interestingly, while ColdCard's hardware contained a physical TRNG, its software restricted randomness to 32 bits. This suggests the issues may not solely lie in the hardware but also in the often neglected firmware. Users are increasingly aware that total self-reliance could be the only solution.

User Reactions and Alternative Solutions

Fear and skepticism dominate recent discussions on forums. A user provocatively suggested, "Just flip a coin 256 times to create your own key." Such comments illustrate the growing doubt many have towards manufacturer assurances concerning wallet security.

Key Highlights

  • Mixed Trust Levels: Users are losing faith in large manufacturers, prompting the consideration of self-custody options.

  • Demand for Transparency: Call for clearer communication from device makers is prominent.

  • Alternative Security Measures: Users are exploring custom wallet creation to regain control over their assets.

Key Insights

  • 🌐 Most wallets fail to assure users of their TRNG effectiveness.

  • πŸ”‘ Trust should be earned, not assumed, multiple comments suggest.

  • πŸ”„ Firmware issues overshadow hardware integrity, claims one seasoned developer.

The ColdCard incident has sparked a crucial discussion among the community, pushing for heightened accountability and innovative approaches to enhance securities in hardware wallets. As scrutiny expectedly increases in the months ahead, experts predict a significant shift in user behavior toward alternative solutions such as custom wallets. This shift could encourage startups dedicated to enhancing user control and securing confidence in device reliability.

Past Repercussions, Present Demands

The current atmosphere surrounding hardware wallet reliability parallels early online banking challenges. Back in those days, trust needed to be built through stringent regulations and security measures. Users expect the same from hardware wallet makers today; if they fail to adapt, they risk losing market share to solutions prioritizing security and transparency.