Edited By
Nicolas Brown

A coalition of key players in finance released Phase 2 of the Capital Markets Risk Mitigation Framework (RMF) on April 15, 2026. Co-authored by major contributors including DTCC, Euroclear, and Hedera, this document aims to provide structured guidance for managing non-financial risks associated with public blockchain infrastructures.
This new industry framework builds upon Phase 1, which focused on tokenized securities on Layer 1 blockchains. The latest version incorporates Layer 2 systems and digital payments, addressing a critical gap for financial institutions in assessing blockchain-related risks.
Interestingly, "public permissioned blockchains can reshape risks associated with financial crime and business continuity," remarked one contributor, emphasizing the framework's relevance.
The RMF features collaboration from various notable entities:
Core Contributors: Hedera, DTCC, Euroclear, Chainlink, Digital Asset, Ava Labs, among others.
Risk Assessment Partners: Blockmosaic, Dfns, and several noteworthy players in financial technology.
Observers: Global organizations including the World Bank and the European Central Bank, showcasing widespread institutional interest.
The framework aims to legitimize public permissioned systems as an essential category for institutional blockchain adoption.
A review of community insights surrounding the RMF reveals:
Support for Hedera's Model - Thereβs a consensus that Hederaβs guided infrastructure presents a robust option amid shifting blockchain dynamics. βThis framework cements Hederaβs advantages,β one comment noted.
Concerns on Layer 2 Complexity - While supporting new capacities, thereβs apprehension about potential complexities introduced by Layer 2 technologies. βL2s add layers, but weβve got to ensure it doesn't become a burden,β another user reflected.
Need for Active Participation - The document calls for institutions to take active roles in governance, diverging from passive consumption of blockchain as a service. βBanks must get involved, not just sit back,β emphasizes a user perspective.
The RMF categorizes risks into three buckets:
Novel Risks: Addressing new technology and security threats.
Adapted Risks: Existing risks that need to be tailored for blockchain contexts.
Standard Risks: Those still managed by traditional frameworks.
This structured approach is a real game-changer, suggesting that institutions can no longer treat blockchain technology as mere software. Now, they must interface with it directly, ensuring their operations support broader ecosystem resilience.
Phase 3, due in late 2026, is set to explore native crypto assets. The path painted by this RMF could significantly alter how institutions interact with blockchain technologies, balancing innovation with risk management.
πΈ RMF's Phase 2 expands guidance to Layer 2 and digital payments.
πΉ Positive reception towards public permissioned systems as viable financial infrastructure.
π βThis framework creates room for the integration of blockchain into traditional finance,β a participant affirmed.
In essence, the RMF is not just a guideline; itβs a necessary roadmap for institutions aiming to thrive in the rapidly evolving blockchain era. As "novel risks" continue to emerge, frameworks like this one are critical for navigating the landscape ahead.
As the RMF paves the way for deeper integration of blockchain technology within conventional finance, experts predict a surge in institutional participation over the next few years. With Phase 3 expected to explore native crypto assets and the corresponding risk management strategies, thereβs a strong chance that institutions will adopt blockchain enhancements by late 2026. Analysts suggest that about 70% of financial firms might begin implementing governance frameworks inspired by RMF to better manage complexities around risk. As these infrastructures take shape, the industry could see a rapid shift toward more innovative, secure, and transparent transaction processes, further legitimizing blockchain as a cornerstone of future financial systems.
Looking back, the transition from steam to electricity during the Industrial Revolution mirrors the current shift towards blockchain. Just as factories had to reconfigure their operations to accommodate a new source of energy, financial institutions now face a crucial pivot from traditional systems to adopting blockchain technologies. The initial confusion and skepticism encountered in the 1880s bears resemblance to today's trepidation surrounding Layer 2 solutions, yet it is this very evolution that birthed unprecedented industrial growth. In the same way that electric power transformed industries, the RMF could lead to a foundational change in how finance functions, adapting not just to new tools but reshaping its entire approach to risk.