Home
/
Crypto news
/
Technology developments
/

Why are cross chain swaps so time consuming?

Cross-Chain Swaps | Users Demand Faster Solutions Amid Frustration

By

Alice Zhang

Jan 26, 2026, 09:44 AM

Edited By

Sofia Ivanova

Updated

Jan 26, 2026, 04:21 PM

2 minutes of duration

Visual representation of the slow cross-chain swap process with a timer and tokens in transit
popular

Crypto enthusiasts are increasingly frustrated with delay-prone cross-chain swaps, sparking discussions on the causes and solutions. Many users report waiting hours, with some trades still processing after over six hours, leading to growing interest in quicker alternatives.

The Wait Dilemma

Users have taken to forums to share their discontent, pointing out that the current system is not sustainable. "Iโ€™m still waiting six hours later. Status says 'processing,'" one frustrated user posted. In contrast, transactions through platforms like alicebob have completed in under three minutes, raising questions about bridge efficiency.

Technical Reasons Behind Delays

Despite some users arguing that bridges prioritize finality and security confirmations, others challenge this notion. A recent commenter explained: "Most bridges are slow because they wait for multiple confirmations, relayers, and sometimes manual checks before releasing funds." Another user added, "Low liquidity or network congestion makes things even worse."

Thereโ€™s also frustration surrounding the technology itself. "Bridges mostly rely on off-chain validators and batching, not the chains directly," said one participant. This viewpoint suggests a view of inherent inefficiency built-into the structure of these systems.

Streamlining Solutions

In response to delays, many users are turning to alternatives. Centralized exchanges (CEX) have gained popularity for providing faster trading options. "I just use CEX for cross-chain now. Itโ€™s quicker than waiting on bridges," noted a user.

Interestingly, using a native wallet like Solflare on the Solana blockchain has been highlighted as a practical solution. "It offers faster signing and better transaction handling, minimizing issues with DEXs or aggregators," one user suggested. This has led to some users feeling that handling transactions per-chain can simplify the process significantly, reducing frustration.

Opportunity Costs

The financial ramifications of these delays are palpable. "Iโ€™ve missed price movements multiple times because of slow bridges. Genuinely kills trading opportunities," lamented a trader. Moreover, others echoed, "Worst is when you wait 8 hours, and it fails. Just lost time and gas for literally nothing." This showcases how time inefficiencies can heavily impact trading strategies.

Emerging Divide on Cross-Chain Futures

While some users are exploring faster options and showing interest in adopting CEXs, others remain cautious about the evolving landscape. "Might try this next time. Been avoiding cross-chain entirely because bridges waste too much time," expressed one user, demonstrating the mixed sentiments prevalent in the community.

Key Insights

  • โ–ณ Reports indicate wait times of up to 12 hours for some trades.

  • โ–ฝ Many people now prefer centralized exchanges for speed.

  • โ€ป "Bridges need to improve or risk losing users" - feedback from users.

This conversation highlights the urgency for effective cross-chain solutions amid growing frustrations. The pressure is on developers to enhance bridging technologies, or risk seeing a continued decline in usage.

Potential Path Forward

Developers may need to prioritize bridging technology improvements in the coming year. As trading habits shift toward faster solutions, experts warn that decentralized bridges must evolve or lose their foothold in the market. If these inefficiencies persist, we could witness a significant shift, with estimates suggesting that nearly 40% of users may favor CEXs over decentralized options by the end of 2026.