Home
/
Investment guides
/
Risk management
/

People overlook crypto loans: why not borrow instead of sell?

People Overlook Crypto Loans | Is It Time to Shift Focus from Selling?

By

Clara Schmidt

Mar 20, 2026, 03:26 AM

Edited By

David Liu

Updated

Mar 20, 2026, 04:26 PM

2 minutes of duration

A person considering crypto loans while holding a Bitcoin and Ethereum symbol, with cash and arrows indicating liquidity options nearby.
popular

A growing number of people are rethinking traditional approaches to accessing cash amid financial strain. Community forums reveal that secure loans against crypto assets are seen as a more attractive option than selling. Many now argue this method offers both liquidity and investment retention without triggering tax implications.

The Move Towards Borrowing

In a pivotal shift, some are opting for crypto-backed loans instead of selling their digital currencies. One community member noted, "I did this during the last dip instead of selling ETH, and it worked out. The tax thing alone makes it worth it.” By leveraging their crypto assets, borrowers can receive cash or stablecoin loans while keeping their investments intact.

Addressing Risks and Considerations

While borrowing against crypto has its benefits, the risks cannot be overlooked. A user shared valid concerns about liquidation risks, emphasizing the need for a conservative loan-to-value (LTV) ratio. "Just gotta keep LTV conservative or you get rekt when it dumps 30% overnight,” they warned. This sentiment echoes throughout discussions, highlighting that monitoring loan positions is essential; failure to do so can lead to costly liquidations.

"The part people underestimate isn’t the rate, it’s the monitoring," one commentator stressed. "If ETH drops 30% while you’re asleep and your LTV hits the threshold, you’re liquidated before you can react.” This underlines a significant barrier: many people are reluctant to take action if it means constant vigilance over their positions.

Community Outlook and Insights

Despite rising awareness of borrowed options, skepticism remains prevalent. Users highlight:

  • Safety in Platforms: Some argue that platforms like Aave may be safer than alternatives such as Nexo due to their established protocols.

  • Awareness Gaps: Many alongside confirmed users still miss out on borrowing options, suggesting that education and clear communication are necessary to enhance participation in crypto lending.

  • Long-term Trust Issues: Remembering past platform failures, some people are hesitant to trust new lending solutions fully.

Key Observations

  • πŸš€ Benefits of Borrowing: Many appreciate retaining investment integrity while accessing liquidity.

  • πŸ“ˆ Conservative Strategies: A prudent approach to LTV is essential for avoiding liquidation risks.

  • πŸ’‘ Educational Demand: There’s a clear need for increased knowledge around the mechanisms of crypto-backed loans.

As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, the looming question remains: will borrowing against crypto gain traction in place of traditional selling? The response from forums suggests that as awareness spreads, more individuals may consider this alternative, potentially influencing market behavior.