Edited By
Carlos Ramirez

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) revealed today that El Salvador has not tapped into public funds for Bitcoin purchases since June 2025. The update raises eyebrows as the country previously announced a significant BTC accumulation.
In a statement, the IMF acknowledged that documentation from El Salvador shows any Bitcoin acquired after June 2025 stemmed from private donations. This comes as the IMF prepares for an agreement with Salvadoran authorities concerning a review of the countryβs Extended Fund Facility, potentially unlocking $140 million for El Salvador.
"The governmentβs holdings of Bitcoin remain unchanged under our program," the IMF had previously said. However, last year, the Salvadoran government added to its Bitcoin portfolio despite the agreement aimed at freezing such transactions.
El Salvador's Bitcoin strategy has sparked considerable debate. In November 2025, the government reported acquiring 1,090 BTC, raising total holdings to 7,474 BTC, despite prior commitments to avoid using public funds. This contradiction has led to skepticism about the transparency of the reported funds.
"The IMF basically saying 'we only care about the spreadsheet' is peak bureaucracy," noted one observer. Others argue that, regardless of the source, the government controls these assets, suggesting they still function as a national reserve.
Interestingly, El Salvador has shifted the management of its Chivo wallet. The state has reduced its role, transferring majority control to a private operator while retaining a minority stake. This restructuring underscores the country's evolving approach to crypto governance and transparency.
Bitcoin, recently nearing $81,000, has shown a 4.5% increase in 24 hours, boasting a market cap close to $1.6 trillion. This price surge adds urgency to the ongoing discussions about the nature of public versus private funding in cryptocurrency reserves.
βΎ El Salvador claims no public funds for BTC since June 2025.
βΎ IMF confirms that all recent Bitcoin acquisitions come from private donations.
βΎ The government now has a private operator managing the Chivo wallet.
π¬ "The distinction between state ownership and source of funding is key."
π Bitcoin's value was approaching $81,000, influencing national crypto policies.
As debates continue, the question remains: Does a Bitcoin reserve funded by private donations still qualify as a national asset? This evolving scenario may have lasting implications for how nations treat cryptocurrency in their economic strategies.
There's a strong chance that El Salvador will navigate increased scrutiny from international financial bodies in the coming months. With ongoing discussions around the Extended Fund Facility, the country may face pressure to clarify its cryptocurrency strategy and funding sources. Experts estimate around a 70% likelihood that El Salvador will need to disclose more detailed reports about its Bitcoin holdings to maintain credibility. If transparency improves, it may help stabilize public trust. However, if doubts linger, the nation could face diminished support from key financial institutions, further complicating its economic landscape.
Looking back, a fresh parallel emerges with the early days of the US Federal Reserve in 1913. At that time, the U.S. was transitioning from a decentralized banking system, rife with instability, to a more regulated model with the establishment of the Fed. Concerns over currency trust and control were similar to today's debates surrounding cryptocurrency governance. Just as the U.S. had to instill confidence in its banking system through regulation, El Salvador must establish a clear framework for its Bitcoin reserves to gain acceptance in the global financial arena.