Edited By
Ravi Patel

In the crypto sphere, discussions around HBAR's value persist. A user recently highlighted some fundamental issues around token attributions, questioning if the surge in transactions per second (TPS) can actually enhance the token's market value.
Blockchain enthusiasts frequently debate whether transaction volume directly affects a token's value.
Fees Are Paid in HBAR: Users purchase HBAR to pay transaction fees priced in USD. This creates a cycle where HBAR is sold again by node operators to cover operational costs.
Market Response to Demand: As HBARβs value stabilizes, market behavior becomes complex. Higher TPS doesnβt guarantee increased holding or demand, as seen with $500-600 million in fees yielding limited long-term holding.
Treasury Limitations: Most fees go to a network treasury which doesnβt sell HBAR immediately. The result? HBAR doesn't effectively exit circulation, impacting its perceived scarcity.
"More transactions only lead to more HBAR flowing through the network without creating a demand to hold them."
The community is vocal on this topic, reflecting a mix of optimism and concern.
Vision Alignment: One user emphasizes that the original goals for Hedera were to facilitate exponential growth. Concerns arise that the reality doesn't align with this grand vision, especially with competing platforms gaining traction.
Tokenomics Critique: Some express skepticism regarding the tokenomics design since it was meant for massive adoption. They argue that without actual demand, the fixed supply of 50 billion HBAR may work against its value.
Long-Term Outlook: Many believe patience is crucial. "Wait two years," some say, hinting at possible changes in market dynamics or improved strategies.
π¬ "Higher TPS doesnβt guarantee long-term value." β A sentiment echoed by numerous users.
π΅ Each transaction is a USD-based purchase reinforcing a dollar-denominated market demand.
π Notably, 80% of fees go to a slow-release vault limiting immediate market circulation.
While HBAR aims to establish itself as a leading player in the blockchain arena, users remain divided on the dynamics affecting its potential profitability. Curious to see how the community navigates these challenges, many hold their breath in hopes that real-world usage might eventually drive changes in holding behavior.
What will it take for HBAR to break through the current stagnation? As innovation continues across the crypto landscape, Hederaβs next steps may prove pivotal.
Expect to see shifts in HBARβs market stance over the next year, as more practical use cases and partnerships emerge. Experts estimate around a 60% chance that strategic collaborations with enterprises could spark real-world adoption, which might drive demand for holding HBAR. This increased utility could potentially stabilize its value long-term. Moreover, if the Hedera foundation can revamp its approach to treasury management, freeing up HBAR for circulation, the likelihood of attracting more investors rises significantly. As competition grows in the blockchain space, HBARβs adaptability to market needs will be essential for its survival and growth.
The situation with HBAR recalls the evolution of the personal computer in the early 1980s. Initially, companies like Apple and IBM faced skepticism about their utility. Many consumers were uncertain on whether these machines would provide real value in daily life. However, as applications expanded, adoption surged, leading to a technological revolution that no one had fully anticipated. Just as the PC transformed industries, HBAR might evolve from a niche asset to an essential player in blockchain technology through innovative applications and strong community support, given the right circumstances.